TaxMama.Com
Ask TaxMama.Com
Tax Information With A Mother's Touch
line
Published by Eva Rosenberg, MBA, EA

Volume 6, Issue 243        January 23, 2004

Home Ask TaxMama Subscribe Ask TaxMamas Secrets
For Tax Pros Gift Shop Relax FAQs Contact Us Site Search
This Week's Issue
arrow The State of the Union
arrow Working With ITINs
arrow Bad News About PPA
- allincome.com
arrow Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)
arrow Not Enough Withheld
arrow Religion is Not Exempt
arrow Too Responsible,
Too Early
 
IRS News
arrow E-Filers Pin
E-Signatures to Forms
 
Money Funnies
arrow Tribal Wisdom
 
Investment Secrets
Tootin` Her Own Horn
Free Workshops
Previous Issues
Our Privacy Policy

printer friendly version

E-Mail 
This Page To A Friend
Your email:
Your name:
TO email:
Too Responsible, Too Early
line


» From: East Hartford, CT

Dear TaxMama:

A few questions about the following situation:

Shortly after my mother-in-law's death, my father in-law added all his 7 siblings to his property deed. Since then he has required moving into an assisted living home because of his health. He's 96.

The house was put on the market and sold with the proceeds divided 8 ways. (250,000 by 8).

  1. Who, if anyone, pays any tax, the one who receives the 1099-S?

  2. If we have to pay on our share, can the "Reduced Maximum Exclusion" rule be used?

  3. Or can we meet the 250,000 rule and all pay no tax?

Thank You, and hoping to hear from you.

Sincerely,

Joe

TaxMama Replies

Hi Joe,

Wow. What a real, crying shame.

You father-in-law never should have done that. A really, really, really, bad move.

If he had sold the property, none of that $250,000 would have been taxable.

By being generous and gifting the property to you all, he wasted a bunch of your money.

If only one 1099 was issued in only one person's name, that person will need to show the full amount of the sale on their tax return.

THEN, attach a schedule showing the names and social security numbers and amounts that went to each sibling. Add those distributions to the cost (or basis) that would have been allocated to the sibling reporting it.

That will result in that sibling only reporting, as a profit, their own share of the profit. It's a bit complicated, if you're not experienced with this.

A good tax pro can easily handle this for you, though.

Remember, the proceeds of $250,000 are not the profit. Deduct the purchase cost of the house, any improvements and all escrow costs for the purchase, sale and any refinancing of the house. The result will be the taxable profit.

If any of the siblings were living in the house for 3 years out of the last 5 years, those siblings's share would be exempt from tax.

One more note, Joe,

Check with an attorney. I know there has been some case law about elderly people and titles to home.

It may be worth a couple of hundred dollars to have someone either research the case law, OR even to get a private letter ruling.

Undoubtedly, your father-in-law intended to die in the home. If you can get that kind of dispensation, and have the home regarded as being his at the time of sale, perhaps you might be able to avoid taxes altogether.

It may not work. But, it's worth investigating.

Best wishes,

Eva Rosenberg
Your TaxMama


TaxMama's Honor Plan
TaxMama's Secrets line



Library of Congress - 
ISSN 1532-0790
Copyright © 2000-2007 -
Eva Rosenberg
Subscribe | Ask TaxMama ~ Send Her Your Questions | Site Search
Home | This Week's Issue | Articles by TaxMama | For Tax Pros
Investment Secrets | IRS News | Smart Tax Moves | Critical Dates
Using Money Wisely | Money Funnies & Inspiration | Because We Care
About TaxMama | Our Privacy Policy | Legalese and Disclaimer | Press Page
Serenata Design
Site design by Serenata Design.